Galvanic Corrosion Explored

Posted: January 24, 2012 in How To & Misc, Uncategorized

Ahh the joy of mixing metals in a closed water loop…:)  While many water coolers have had excellent success with running copper/brass/nickel over the years with plain water, we have seen many examples of where certain conditions result in not so favorable results.  While we often call copper/brass loops a “Similar” metals loop, I think we are also forgetting that “Similar” is not the “Same” and we have a LOT more than just copper and brass in our loops.  Your typical water cooling loop has a mixture of copper, brass, nickel, and tin.  Note, that I think I’m the first example of the “TIN” corrosion by an unintentional experiment I had been carrying out over the last year or so..:)

The manufacturers pretty much all say “use our coolant” which includes corrosion inhibitors, yet we persist in thinking nothing is wrong with this mixing of “Similar” metals.  I’m not a corrosion expert by any means and have typically had the same or similar good success without the use of inhibitors.  I am however becoming more of a believer of corrosion potential as these repeated problems persist and as I have now experienced a recent loss myself.

Last year when doing my fan testing series, I filled up two radiators with water as part of my testing rig templates.  One was a Swiftech MCR120, and one was a Hardware Labs SR1 140.  Upon digging those radiators out in preparation for my radiator testing bench rebuild, I noticed that the MCR was still full of water, but the SR1 140 was empty.  I also noticed what appeared to be water stains on the bottom of the SR1.

Could this be corrosion?  I thought..

Oh my, my SR1 has become a victim of corrosion!!

But I thought the idea was if you run copper/brass loops, corrosion wasn’t possible?

Well…it is..

My SR1 is now a leaking sieve, so I decided to do a little digging in on galvanic corrosion.  I think most people including myself have been thinking about corrosion between copper/brass/nickel, but I don’t think we have been thinking about the solder in radiators.

What is Galvanic Corrosion?

Per Wiki:

Galvanic corrosion is an electrochemical process in which one metalcorrodes preferentially to another when both metals are in electrical contact and immersed in an electrolyte. The same galvanic reaction is exploited in primary batteries to generate a voltage.

So it’s not all bad..after all Galvanic corrosion is what starts your car in the morning..:)

What is needed for Galvanic Corrosion?

Per the corrosiondoctors.org:

  1. Electrochemically dissimilar metals must be present

  2. These metals must be in electrical contact, and

  3. The metals must be exposed to an electrolyte

Of particular interest to me is #2, I didn’t realize that the metals had to be in electrical contact, but that does explain a few things I’ve been seeing.

Now to make sense of my SR1 loss:

Ok, so in a closed loop of water, while water is initially non-conductive, it only takes a short time in a water loop to become contaminated and conductive.  Once conductive it now satisfies the “Electrolyte” criteria. #3 is done.  The stagnant condition (and not at all typical) probably made this many times amplified.

Also the metals must be in electrical contact.  In my radiator example the soldered connection of the radiator fins is clearly a good metal contact. #2 is satisfied.

And finally they must be dissimilar metals:

According to the corrosiondoctors.org anodic index, it appears a normal copper solder radiator has about a .30 galvanic potential.

Yep, seems to make sense I guess.  How about a few other examples others have shared:

ALUMINUM/COPPPER

Aluminum and Copper in direct contact.  Pn0yb0i gave an example of what running an aluminum/copper block can do after an extremely long 4 year run here.  He was going to reuse the block after cleaning, so I ask him if I could use some of his pictures if I sent him a replacement block sample for free.  He accepted happily and I feel better that he’s got a new block too..:)  Anyhow, here are a couple of photos that he shared and gave me permission to use.

He said he used distilled water plus pentosin and purged every 2 months.

And to compare the anodic index between copper and aluminum.

In general most manufactures have given up on attempting to make aluminum/copper blocks, which has led to eliminating that problem.

However, as water cooling has become “Art” as much as it is performance, there has been a dramatic increase in Nickel plating of blocks.  It is handy not having to deal with tarnished copper and a lot of people like the shiny surface of Nickel plating which in itself has caused problems as well…

Nickel Plating

The hot topic in the forums has been in regard to nickel plating failures.  Manufacturing processes have been improving regarding the plating quality.  Electroless plating is the latest preferred method which is supposed to plate the parts more evenly.

If you look at the anodic index again and compare nickel to copper, you can see it is actually very similar in index meaning their corrosion potential is very small.  In the case of metal corrosion, opposites attract and nickel/copper are very similar.

But….the difference is still there.

We have seen failures on blocks and we have seen failures on fittings.  The one commonality I have seen in all the various forum examples is “stagnant” water.  Just like my radiator example, where you normally see plating fail, is where water sits still.  I believe this stagnant condition is what promotes the #3 electrolyte condition.  The longer the water sits still near metals the more contaminated and electrolyte like it gets.  We typically see plating failures between surfaces such as the GPU block and acrylic or delrin top.  We also see it between CPU nozzle plates and the CPU block bases plated in nickel. In fittings we see the plating failures at the threads…again where the water is stagnant.

The other reason I think the small index still causes problems is simply due to the plating being very thin it just doesn’t take much to show.  Also since copper is the anode to nickel, it works in an undermining process where the copper goes away, and the nickel flakes.  Also as the copper goes away and undermines the nickel, it creates a pocket where that electrolyte enhancement (stagnant water) grows even faster.

I do think a “Perfect Plating Job” could avoid the issue with plastic tops, if there was a perfect nickel plating over the copper block and that was the only metal in direct contact, you will have essentially removed the “electrolyte” variable.  If there is no way for the electrolyte (water) to get between the copper and nickel, then life is peachy.  I just don’t think plating is ever perfect.  Any little microscopic pin hole, scratch, or thread wearing into the plate will expose the copper allowing the reaction to occur.

What is the problem?

  • We are mixing metals.
  • Some of the mixed metals have direct electrical contact.
  • Our water is becoming an electrolyte with stagnant water conditions in some areas.

Sacrificial Anodes

One thing that hasn’t really been explored much in water cooling is the use of sacrificial anodes.  These are used quite regularly for corrosion applications where the idea is to make the electrolytes go after a more active metal instead of the metals you are trying to protect.  The anode need to be in electrical contact with the other metals and will over time corrode and need replacement.  You see them in household water heaters and on ships in saltwater, and bridges along the coast.  Most industries that have some sort of corrosion problem lean toward either or a corrosion inhibitor or some sort of anode to provide that protection.

I don’t see why you couldn’t have some sort of zinc barb insert or something that could be easily replaced though. I’m not quite sure what sort of deposits the zinc would make, but it should theoretically work in preventing corrosion from occurring. I’m not sure???

I could see that as being a possible solution for folks that would rather not run anything than water. That’s what we do for water heaters (inhibitors not possible), why not for water cooling?

Anyhow, not sure if sacrificial anodes would work or not, but I’m really curious to try. It could be a solution for giving plain water loops corrosion protection without the fuss of a coolant with inhibitors.  You would just need to attach a piece of zinc to each of the mixed metals blocks/rads and see what happens.

Conclusion

I don’t think it is possible to completely stop galvanic corrosion from occurring, but we can reduce it by:

  • Eliminating direct electrical contact of dissimilar metals (Plastic top/unplated copper base blocks)
  • Reduce Electrolytic Conditions – Reduce areas where water is stagnant, flow is your friend.  Regular maintenance and complete cleaning of the block/pieces probably helps too.
  • Improve plating processes and increase plating thicknesses.
  • Slow the process with corrosion inhibitors in the fluid
  • Slow the process using a sacrificial anode in system running plain water.
But I don’t think you will completely stop corrosion.  The idea is to keep it at bay long enough and/or reduce it for the intended service life. Unless you made the entire loop of one metal or kept all the metal parts from touching one another, you will have the potential for galvanic corrosion to occur.

Cheers!

Martin

Comments
  1. Andrew says:

    So basically the best thing to do is regularly replace the fluid in the system. Am I understanding correctly?

    • Martinm210 says:

      That’s one thing that probably helps, but bottom line corrosion potential is there when two metals touch and we have that in many locations throughout ever day loops. Bottom line for me is that you can probably avoid most problems by avoiding plated products and plan on cleaning oxidation from solid copper. In that circumstance it’s still corrosion, but it’s corrosion that can be repaired by the users. On plated products is a bit more of a gamble. If the plating is perfect, you might get away with it for years without any evidence of corrosion. If it’s not you may or may not have plating failures depending on the conditions present. You can slow corrosion using inhibitors, and the goal is to slow it down enough to reach your next upgrade timeframe, but you can not stop it.

      If you want full RMA protection, follow the manufacturer’s recommendations which includes using their recommended coolant.

      • dal says:

        I have found the best coolant addative on the market that does the following
        EIGHT PRODUCTS
        in one

        A. CLEANER/DESCALER/EMULSIFIER
        B. INHIBITOR
        C. LUBRICATOR
        D. CONDITIONER
        E. STABILIZER
        F. WATER WETTER
        G. OXYGEN SCAVENGER
        H. LEAK DETECTOR (BLACK LIGHT) DYE
        It is biodegradeable and nontoxic that keeps ph between 8-10

        Dal Carter p eng

  2. Phos says:

    This article has me trying to come up with an all copper/plastic loop meant for ultra low maintenance, which is actually pretty easy if you’re willing to spend a bit more and get an Aquacomputer Airplex Modularity System, but I’m also wondering if the stainless steel top on the planned AquagraFX is something I should reconsider.

  3. Phos says:

    Hmm, it seems even the AMS has a bit of steel in it.

  4. Phos says:

    I think the steel bits are pressed in flanges. The fittings aren’t a concern because they’re mounted to delrin, unless contact with the water counts as electrical contact. If it does, that condition seems a bit of a gimme, what electrolyte solution isn’t conductive?

  5. Merz says:

    Has anyone ever considered using a non conducting fluid like oil, and using sacraficial galvanic protection?

    • Martinm210 says:

      Distilled water is about as low in conductivity as you can get that’s practical to use. I bought a conductivity meter and have found even the regular grocery store distilled water I’ve been buying has been between 1-3uS/cm. By definition distilled water should be below 10uS no matter where you buy it. Tap water from a municipality however is up in the 200uS range and regular erosion by running any of these in a system for long will immediately spike the conductivity in a fairly short time. There are the ultra pure waters out there that go even below 1uS, but I without knowing how this conductivity changes over time inside the system, I question the value of it over standard distilled.

      I do think you can probably reduce the conductivity by frequent flushing, but there really hasn’t been any testing to show the contamination rate to help understand how often you’d need to do this. I suspect it depends quite a bit on how well flushed the parts are too where brand new parts are likely going to have more.

      Also no real data on the sacrificial anode idea either yet. Some have suggested it won’t work in a closed loop, but I’m not sure.

      • Merz says:

        I’m actually in the process of building a cpu cooler from scratch.

        http://www.overclockers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=701267

        I was planning on using sacrafical galvanic protection for the loop. Also, distilled water will become more conductive as bits of metal, salts, residue and other things become suspended in it. I want to use oil because it has a high resistivity and pretty good thermal capacity, and because it would protect the internal surfaces of the components from oxidizing. however, this could be totally the wrong way to go about this?

        • Martinm210 says:

          Cool project, always enjoy the home built blocks. We used to see a lot more of that, very cool! I guess you could try it, but I haven’t seen anyone really try to pump oil. From what I understand it takes a very different pump to move oil. I would probably just use a corrosion blocker based coolant myself, and maybe experiment with an anode for fun.

  6. PepeLapiu says:

    Okay Martin, I really like the idea of a sacrificial anode but……….
    That badly corroded CPU block appears to be copper, in an aluminium/copper loop.
    You would think that the aluminium would be a huge sacrificial anode so why is the copper so oxidized?

  7. Teh Rav3n says:

    Hi Martin, glad to see you’ve got the site back up. :D I think I’m going to go ahead and try the zinc anode, since I have a source for high purity zinc rod, and a brand new build underway.

    One thought that occurred to me whilst reading the article was; What about minimizing the dissimilar metal contact? e.g.: using teflon tape on the thread of fittings, as per usual when assembling any other type of liquid carrying fitting.

    Obviously the threads will cut through to a minor extent at the peak & valley of the thread (which won’t make direct contact in any case), but the load bearing portion, or shoulder of the thread should be completely protected from conductive contact between say, the fitting & radiator.

    Just a thought. ;)

    • Martinm210 says:

      If you can completely isolate the direct metal to metal contact that may work, but it’s pretty tough with threading I think since it wouldn’t take much for deposits or any little bit of corrosion to bridge what gap you can make up. Threads do seem like a problem area though as it is an area were water is very still and the threading action alone likes to scratch the surfaces to start the reaction.

      Let us know how it goes. I haven’t started any long term corrosion or anode type tests myself, but still very curious how or if it would work.

  8. PepeLapiu says:

    Hi Martin. I am not sure I understand. Are you advising for or against bare copoer blocks with plastic/acetal tops?

    Also, in an aluminium/copper loop, it appears the aluminium is the anode. So why is the copper block getting so badly corroded in phOnboi’s pictures? We should see the aluminium corrode, no?

    • Martinm210 says:

      For bare copper. That way if you do have a little corrosion it is something you can clean up relatively easy (you can’t really fix plating failure unless you bead blast the plating off entirely. A little copper oxidation or material loss on bare copper isn’t going to show very much.

      Yes, I think typically that is correct but in extreme cases there does appear to be some damage by both metals but mostly the anode metal. Only experience I have really had is that SR-1 radiator having issue with stagnant water sitting for a year. Seemed to leave a crusty mess behind.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s